<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Load-Balancer on IT Comparison</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/load-balancer/</link><description>Recent content in Load-Balancer on IT Comparison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:30:57 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/load-balancer/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Load Balancer vs Reverse Proxy: Traffic Distribution vs Request Mediation</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-load-balancer-vs-reverse-proxy-traffic-distribution-vs-reque/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:30:57 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-load-balancer-vs-reverse-proxy-traffic-distribution-vs-reque/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;load balancer&lt;/strong&gt; spreads incoming traffic across many identical backend servers so no single machine gets overwhelmed, while a &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;reverse proxy&lt;/strong&gt; sits in front of one or more servers to mediate, secure, and transform requests on their behalf. The two overlap heavily in practice — most modern reverse proxies (NGINX, Envoy, HAProxy) can also load balance — but the distinction matters when you&amp;rsquo;re deciding which capability you actually need to configure or scale for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>