<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Feature-Branching on IT Comparison</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/feature-branching/</link><description>Recent content in Feature-Branching on IT Comparison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 05:25:41 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/feature-branching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Trunk-Based Development vs Feature Branching: Branch Strategy Compared</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-trunk-based-development-vs-feature-branching-branch-strategy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 05:25:41 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-trunk-based-development-vs-feature-branching-branch-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both are strategies for organizing how developers integrate code changes into a shared codebase, but they differ sharply in timing and isolation. &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;Trunk-based development&lt;/strong&gt; pushes small changes directly into a shared main line multiple times a day, while &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;feature branching&lt;/strong&gt; isolates each unit of work on its own branch until it&amp;rsquo;s fully ready to merge. The choice shapes how much CI/CD investment, feature-flag discipline, and merge-conflict risk a team signs up for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>