<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Cost-Optimization on IT Comparison</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/cost-optimization/</link><description>Recent content in Cost-Optimization on IT Comparison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:33:25 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/cost-optimization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Auto Scaling vs Manual Scaling: Who Adjusts Capacity?</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-auto-scaling-vs-manual-scaling-who-adjusts-capacity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:33:25 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-auto-scaling-vs-manual-scaling-who-adjusts-capacity/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Auto scaling and manual scaling both change how much compute capacity an application has, but they differ in who — or what — decides when that change happens. Auto scaling relies on an &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;automated feedback loop&lt;/strong&gt; that watches metrics and reacts on its own, while manual scaling depends on &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;human intervention&lt;/strong&gt; to notice load and issue the change. That difference in decision-maker drives everything else: reaction speed, cost efficiency, and how much ongoing attention the system needs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Spot Instances vs On-Demand Instances: When Cheap Compute Comes With Strings Attached</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-spot-instances-vs-on-demand-instances-when-cheap-compute-com/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:25:19 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-spot-instances-vs-on-demand-instances-when-cheap-compute-com/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both are ways to rent compute capacity from a cloud provider, but they trade cost against reliability in opposite directions. &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;Spot Instances&lt;/strong&gt; tap into unused capacity at steep discounts but can be reclaimed with almost no notice, while &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;On-Demand Instances&lt;/strong&gt; cost more per hour in exchange for a guaranteed, uninterrupted slot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="comparison-diagram"&gt;Comparison Diagram&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="compare-diagram"&gt;
&lt;svg viewBox="0 0 640 360" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"&gt;&lt;text x="320" y="28" text-anchor="middle" font-size="13" style="fill:var(--secondary)"&gt;Timeline of a running workload&lt;/text&gt;&lt;text x="60" y="62" font-size="15" font-weight="600" style="fill:var(--compare-b)"&gt;On-Demand Instance&lt;/text&gt;&lt;rect x="60" y="80" width="520" height="50" rx="4" style="fill:var(--compare-b-soft);stroke:var(--compare-b)" stroke-width="1.5"/&gt;&lt;text x="320" y="110" text-anchor="middle" font-size="13" style="fill:var(--content)"&gt;Reserved for you, no interruptions&lt;/text&gt;&lt;text x="60" y="148" font-size="12" style="fill:var(--secondary)"&gt;Runs continuously until you stop it&lt;/text&gt;&lt;line x1="60" y1="175" x2="580" y2="175" style="stroke:var(--border)" stroke-width="1" stroke-dasharray="3,4"/&gt;&lt;text x="60" y="212" font-size="15" font-weight="600" style="fill:var(--compare-a)"&gt;Spot Instance&lt;/text&gt;&lt;rect x="60" y="230" width="180" height="50" rx="4" style="fill:var(--compare-a-soft);stroke:var(--compare-a)" stroke-width="1.5"/&gt;&lt;text x="150" y="260" text-anchor="middle" font-size="13" style="fill:var(--content)"&gt;Running&lt;/text&gt;&lt;rect x="240" y="230" width="60" height="50" rx="4" style="fill:none;stroke:var(--border)" stroke-width="1.5" stroke-dasharray="4,3"/&gt;&lt;polygon points="270,203 280,220 260,220" style="fill:var(--compare-a-soft);stroke:var(--compare-a)" stroke-width="1.2"/&gt;&lt;text x="270" y="217" text-anchor="middle" font-size="9" style="fill:var(--compare-a)"&gt;!&lt;/text&gt;&lt;text x="270" y="296" text-anchor="middle" font-size="11" style="fill:var(--secondary)"&gt;2-min warning&lt;/text&gt;&lt;text x="270" y="310" text-anchor="middle" font-size="11" style="fill:var(--secondary)"&gt;then reclaimed&lt;/text&gt;&lt;rect x="300" y="230" width="280" height="50" rx="4" style="fill:var(--compare-a-soft);stroke:var(--compare-a)" stroke-width="1.5"/&gt;&lt;text x="440" y="260" text-anchor="middle" font-size="13" style="fill:var(--content)"&gt;Resumes on new capacity&lt;/text&gt;&lt;text x="60" y="334" font-size="12" style="fill:var(--secondary)"&gt;Up to 90% cheaper, but availability is never guaranteed&lt;/text&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 id="comparison-table"&gt;Comparison Table&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Aspect&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Spot Instances&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;On-Demand Instances&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Request &amp;amp; provisioning&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Fulfilled only if provider has spare capacity at your bid price&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Fulfilled immediately from reserved capacity pools&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Capacity guarantee&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;None — provider can reclaim the instance at any time&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Guaranteed for as long as you keep paying&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Pricing model&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Variable, set by real-time supply and demand for spare capacity&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Fixed hourly rate published by the provider&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Interruption behavior&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Reclaimed with a short warning (e.g. ~2 minutes on AWS)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Never interrupted by the provider; you control shutdown&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Cost predictability&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Fluctuates; can spike or be revoked when demand rises&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Stable and predictable, easy to forecast in a budget&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Ideal workloads&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Fault-tolerant, stateless, or checkpointable batch jobs&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Stateful, latency-sensitive, or continuously running services&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Termination control&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Provider-initiated; your app must handle abrupt shutdown&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;User-initiated; you decide exactly when it stops&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h2 id="key-differences"&gt;Key Differences&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Spot pricing floats with market demand and can be up to 90% cheaper than &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;On-Demand&lt;/strong&gt; rates&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Spot capacity is &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;reclaimable&lt;/strong&gt; at any time, typically with only a short warning window&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On-Demand gives a firm &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;capacity guarantee&lt;/strong&gt; that Spot never promises&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Workloads on Spot need to tolerate sudden termination or design for &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;checkpointing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On-Demand cost is fixed and predictable, while Spot cost is variable and market-driven&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="when-to-use-each"&gt;When to Use Each&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spot Instances&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>