<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Block-Storage on IT Comparison</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/block-storage/</link><description>Recent content in Block-Storage on IT Comparison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:22:17 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/tags/block-storage/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Object Storage vs Block Storage: Data Model and Access Pattern</title><link>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-object-storage-vs-block-storage-data-model-and-access-patter/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:22:17 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://comparison.metacog.co.kr/posts/2026-08-03-object-storage-vs-block-storage-data-model-and-access-patter/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Block storage exposes raw, fixed-size &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;disk blocks&lt;/strong&gt; to a single attached server, just like a physical hard drive — ideal for databases and boot volumes needing low-latency random reads and writes. Object storage instead organizes data as whole items with &lt;strong class="kw"&gt;rich metadata&lt;/strong&gt; in a flat, HTTP-accessible namespace, trading fine-grained in-place edits for virtually unlimited scale. The choice determines whether your application talks to storage like a disk or like a web API.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>